If not, is there a clear and realistic plan to target potential beneficiaries of the outputs and outcomes? Case for support, totalling up to eight A4 sides, comprising up to two A4 sides for a track record, and six A4 sides describing proposed research and its context. Sustainable bio-based materials and manufacture: feasibility study. Before starting an application, you will need to log in or create an account in Je-S. Once you have completed your application, make sure you submit document. All attachments must be completed in single-spaced typescript in Arial 11 or other sans serif typeface of equivalent size, with margins of at least 2cm. This must be attached, as a single document, using the Case for Support attachment type in Je-S, justification of resources up to two A4 sides, CVs, up to two A4 sides each, for named research staff (including researcher co-investigators), or visiting researchers. You and your international partners may have a previous relationship, but we do not expect you to have worked together extensively. The full economic cost of your project can be up to 4. You will have a chance to provide a response to the assessment, which will be considered in the ranking of the proposal. Work in collaboration with . For sensitive information the applicant should state clearly whether the information is confidential. For any items or combined assets with a value above 138,000 a two-page equipment business case must also be included in the proposal documentation. Information provided as part of the intention to submit will not be formally assessed. EPSRC . Requests for resources should be clearly articulated in the justification of resources section of the grant application. acknowledges support from EPSRC New Investigator Award (grant ref. Complex, multi-faceted research projects with many objectives are not appropriate to the new investigator award. You should also consider that this unequal impact may continue beyond the return to work. https://www.ukri.org/councils/epsrc/guidance-for-reviewers/peer-reviews/reviewer-forms-and-guidance-notes/new-investigator-award, Browse our areas of investment and support, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Download the New Investigator peer review form, San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment, part-time working for the principal investigator, co-investigators, post-doctoral research assistants, technicians or wider team costed on a grant, support for costs over and above standard care arrangements to allow the principal investigator or their team to attend activities associated with the grant (for example conferences) where costs cannot be met by the employer. It may be that you feel you can only comment with authority on a specific part or component of an application, for example with a multidisciplinary project, or perhaps where there is a strong user-led element. Stage one. When you submit the application, it will first go to your host organisation for review. The changes also mean that some researchers who may have previously been ineligible to . Thus, how to . Unfunded applications will not have their information published. Where applicants wish to include details on flexible working or a career break for reviewers to take into account in their assessment, they are not required to explain the personal circumstances that resulted in the need for this. Posted on 14 February 2018. We expect the majority of your research to fall within our remit. To solve these worldwide issues, the UK becomes the first major economy to pass the net-zero emissions law. You should note that your review will be sent back, unattributed, to the investigator, who will then be allowed the opportunity to comment on any factual errors and answer any specific queries you have raised. Complex, multifaceted research projects with many objectives are not appropriate for this scheme. NERC - the Natural Environment Research Council Swindon. Advice on writing proposals for EPSRC funding. support for postdoctoral research assistant time, a grant for equipment worth more than 20,000. As impact should be an embedded activity in the research programme, you should also assess the suitability and appropriateness of the methodology to realise impact in the proposal. EPSRC acknowledges that it is a challenge for applicants to determine the future impacts of COVID-19 while the pandemic continues to evolve. Applications will only be assessed by 1 panel. The webinar will last for an hour, it will begin with a presentation from the EPSRC international team and will be followed by an opportunity to ask questions about the funding opportunity. You should hear the result of your application within 26 weeks of submission by your host organisation. UKRI staff will use this information to understand: Full proposals will be assessed by an expert panel. For multidisciplinary proposals please state which aspects of the proposal you feel qualified to assess, contributes to or helps maintain the health of other disciplines, contributes to addressing key UK societal challenges, contributes to future UK economic success and development of emerging industry or industries, meets national needs by establishing or maintaining a unique world-leading activity, complements other UK research funded in the area, including any relationship to the EPSRC portfolio, plans for dissemination and knowledge exchange with potential beneficiaries of the research, appropriateness of the track record of the applicant or applicants, unique and complementary contribution and expertise of the international partner or partners, appropriateness of the plans for developing the collaborative relationship with the international partner or partners, balance of skills of the project team, including collaborators, the level of the contribution made to this award from other sources including the UK institutions and international potential partners, any equipment requested, or the viability of the arrangements described to access equipment needed for this project, and particularly on any university or third-party contribution, any resources requested for activities to either increase impact, for public engagement or to support responsible innovation. Planning for activities that maximise the likelihood of any identified impacts occurring is a vital part of research. Reviewers are not required to consider this additional information when providing comments on an application. Investigators must be academic employees (lecturer or equivalent) of an eligible organisation. EPSRC may reject applications that do not meet attachment format requirements. Other issues you might also comment on are the uniqueness (or otherwise) of the collaboration, the value of the contribution of the component you can judge, and the significance of this in terms of future potential development in your own field. 2021. For example: applicant is on maternity leave until a certain . whether the proposal demonstrates that the applicants have the expertise and capabilities to deliver the project. For multidisciplinary applications please state which aspects of the application you feel qualified to assess. This occurs when an organisation cannot be listed as a project partner, for example when the host institution wants to detail a proposed contribution to the cost of the equipment. contributes to, or helps maintain, the health of other disciplines, contributes to addressing key UK societal challenges or contributes to future UK economic success and development of emerging industry(s), complements other UK research already funded in the area, including any relationship to the EPSRC portfolio, meets national needs by establishing or maintaining a unique world-leading activity. Summary. Download the New Investigator peer review form. Your application is assessed by peer review. Apply for funding to initiate or develop new international partnerships with researchers overseas and to tackle the challenges faced by developing countries.. how the research fits with and complements other UK research already funded in the area or related areas, including the relationship to the EPSRC portfolio and our stated strategy set out in our portfolio. You are asked to assess the application or report against a number of criteria. The UK is at the forefront of addressing global societal and economic challenges that have engineering and physical sciences at the heart, including climate change, cyber security and long-term sustainable growth. Epsrc.ac.uk. The additional information will be requested from you in late March 2023. Found in: Talent UK - 30 minutes ago. There are 2 parallel funding routes to this funding opportunity: The full economic cost of your project can be up to 200,000 with a duration of up to 2 years. If youre applying through the New Investigator Award scheme, you should attach a statement from your host university, typically your head of department describe the universitys commitment to your research career development, and confirm your appointment details and period of probation if relevant. Designing and developing new in situ synchrotron experiments in collaboration with central facility scientists, including the drafting of . The scheme aims to support them in establishing a research group and developing their research vision. The grant value may include the cost of access to facilities (these funds are not awarded to the grant holding organisation). If applications to the open funding route and international development funding route are assessed at the same panel they will be ranked on separate rank order lists. These criteria vary according to the scheme or funding opportunity that the application has been submitted to. New Investigator Award: Starts: 05 January 2021: Ends: 04 August 2023: Value (): 243,689: . It is particularly important therefore that the panel have clear advice on the merits of each component. For example, we often have . Dr Meghan Halse has been awarded 210,439 from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) to support research on "Lighting up Magnetic Resonance: SABRE optimisation powered by in situ detection". Where you believe that there are less than three potential suppliers for an item you should explain this in the justification of resources. comment on the effectiveness of the proposed planning and management, and on whether the requested resources are appropriate and have been fully justified. As with all EPSRC grants, applicants should request the appropriate suite of resources to carry out the proposed research. You will be asked to provide the following information: You are not required to have finalised all the details of your application by the time the intention to submit is made. This funding opportunity is also subject to our policy on repeatedly unsuccessful submissions. Location White City Campus - Hybrid. The prompts are given as a reminder of those issues that are likely to be most significant in determining the overall merit of an application. You should comment on how well this has been done and on the appropriateness of the resources requested. . It should cover the context, importance, methodology and all the associated work and activities you propose to carry out that will make this a high-quality research programme. The applicant should have provided appropriate methodology to deliver the research and impact programme. epsrc new investigator award example. The decision of which scheme to apply for is for individuals to make in consultation with their research offices. The Vice Chancellor's Fellow at the School of Chemistry of the University of Bristol, has won an EPSRC New Investigator Award worth 392,000. Where candidates are unclear on their eligibility for a particular scheme after consulting the guidance, frequently asked questions, and their research office, then they can contact EPSRC for advice. Your application must also include the following attachments: You should attach your documents as PDF documents to avoid errors. EPSRC. support for full economic costs greater than 100,000. how competitive the proposed work is and how it compares to related international activity, whether the applicants show how their research fits with activities elsewhere in the world and whether they demonstrate awareness of the context and landscape within which they operate, to what extent the research will provide the UK with a unique capability, whether the applicant has presented the academic, industrial, policy, societal or other relevant context clearly. EPSRC complies with the General Data Protection Regulations 2016/679 (EU) (GDPR). Grants are awarded under the standard UK Research and Innovation grant terms and conditions. National importance should also be a major consideration in making your assessment. The reviewer form asks reviewers to comment on the national importance of the research. 1423 . Impact acceleration account (IAA) is a strategic award that provides funding to Queen's University for a wide range of impact activities. Flexible working includes, but is not limited to, reduction in full-time hours, long-term partial return to work, job sharing, compressed working hours, term-time only working, annualised hours. the ideas, concepts and approaches proposed and any particularly strong or weak examples within the programme, whether the applicant has provided clear aims and objectives for the technical programme, and how they will monitor their achievements. Encourage a greater degree of university support to aid career development. To assist the prioritisation panel in reaching their overall conclusion on the application, and to help EPSRC in monitoring the effectiveness of its reviewer selection procedures, you are asked to indicate your confidence in your review. Early career researcher collaborations for global development. We expect the proposed collaborative project to present a balance between partnership building activities and direct research, as appropriate, considering the key objectives of the funding opportunity. Total Price. Find out more about what to include in the case for support. This should report your own confidence, or otherwise, in being able to make your assessment rather than your confidence in the success of the application if it were funded. existing engagements with relevant end users and the appropriateness of any partnerships. Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter - 964 . We encourage you to contact us first to discuss your proposal if you believe your research may cross research council boundaries. It is also a helpful technique to raise issues or concerns with the application in the form of explicit questions for the applicants. EPSRC staff offer their hints and tips on writing strong funding applications and tackle some of the common misconceptions around applying for EPSRC funding. To find the opportunity, search for: NSF Global Centres. You will not be able to apply after this time. Apply before: February 3, 2023. For more information, see guidance on what makes a good project partner letter of support. Applicants are required to identify all resources required to successfully accelerate the creation of impact, and to clearly explain the need for these in the justification of resources. This is one of a number of options offered by EPSRC for researchers seeking to establish their career, including fellowships, managed calls, and responsive mode. Elegance of presentation is not, of itself, an assessment criterion for an EPSRC grant. Nursing Management Business and Economics History +104. They should be completed in single-spaced Arial 11 font or similar-sized sans serif typeface. Investigate high-priority use cases for exascale software - deadline 28th September 2021 (restrictions apply) Establish an international network in quantum technologies - deadline 30th September 2021. . The duration of the project should be appropriate to deliver these typically 1 to 3 years. Trusted research and innovation is a UKRI work programme designed to support cross-sector campaigns that protect all those working in our thriving and collaborative international sector. Reviewers are requested to comment on the effectiveness of the proposed planning and management making reference to equipment and resources as follows: You should draw attention to any request that in your view has not been justified or, conversely, if something is required but has not been identified. We will not accept uninvited resubmissions of projects that have been submitted to UKRI or any other funder. is based at a UK research organisation eligible for EPSRC funding. All these approaches could demonstrate excellence so your judgement should not simply be based on which approach has been adopted. If the applicant is applying for a grant which has an interview assessment stage, they should inform EPSRC of any personal circumstances for EPSRC to consider. The changes also mean that some researchers who may have previously been ineligible to . UKRI is implementing a standard method for inputting overseas costs on Je-S from 1 July 2021. The new target requires the UK to bring all greenhouse gas emissions to net-zero by 2050. Applicants are permitted to only be involved with 1 application for this funding opportunity.
epsrc new investigator award example