canon 135mm f2 astrophotography

The lens hood is removable (and reversible), which makes packing the Rokinon 135mm away into the included lens pouch possible. I just purchased a very lightly used Canon 200mm F2.8L II USM for $620 from a great online dealer and can't wait for an opportunity to try it out with my Astronomik CLS clip on a T4i at a dark site. 45 minutes. Whereas quality apochromats can be corrected with broad band filters, such as the Astronomik UV/IR cut filter or the CLS-CCD filter, telephoto lenses can not. I am a complete amateur at photography in general and this is all new to me so thank you for all the information and videos. Read on to find out which you should be using and why! The Canon 135mm f/2 is no less impressive on a full-frame camera. That whole rig comes to about $1200, minus the mount. But this lens changed my mind. 85 Is a different story, my 85 gets used a lot. A quick question, I have a Sony a6300 mirrorless camera which is great but the sensor is very close behind the mount. An update to the Mini 11, the new camera adds parallax correction capabilities, automatic flash control and a multi-function twist lens. It can isolate subject while being tack sharp with beautiful creamy bokeh when used at f2. when you hold the lens in your hand you know you are holding a fine peice of optical equipment. However, they can be perfectly corrected with narrow band H-alpha or OIII filters. (on a full frame camera)Wonderful lens for some portraiture applications, sporting events and candids at a party or event. In these situations, a portable, wide-field imaging rig wins. if you really want to get the best gym photos that can be taken, use it and enjoy what you will see. You will never be able to beat this lense, believe me, i have tried them all. There are quite a few other excellent lenses out there, and nowadays, quite a few that can be used wide open. But even better BOKEH is the SAL-135F2.8F4.5 STF (Smooth Trans Focus ) which has even better BOKEH, albeit a manual focus lens. But like a glitch in the matrix, an anomaly that shouldn't exist, you can get the Samyang/Rokinon 135mm for as little as $430 brand new. The extremes are 2 and 22. You can also find him as @mwroll on Instagram and 500px. If you can tolerate vignetting, there are many normal 35mm lenses that are great wide open. Then you should have tried the 180mm nikkor ED, the old one, which is the favorite tool of a lot of astrophotographers. The best of them, Nikon's 70-200E, is just as sharp all but the very best primes - ie, already too sharp for most portrait work. If You can not, buy Canon EF 85/1.8, which delivers quite similar results. It improves slightly stopped down. You might never need another lens in the overlapping range at 135mm there isn't much difference between the separation afforded by f/2 vs f/2.8, and the latest 70-200s are plenty sharp. Backwards compatible (film). The F/2.0 maximum aperture of the Rokinon 135mm lens offers a chance to collect a serious amount of signal in a single shot. Many students just wanted to take better snapshots of family, vacation, pets, etc. But do some experimenting before you decide. Everyone assumes their definition is the "true" one. For some reason Samyang makes lenses nobody is asking for. If you have the 1.8 version, way to go. - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: I have recently received my star adventurer and as of now only have the star adventurer, benro tripod (super stable), and a unmodded canon t2i with only a 18-55mm lens. Thanks, Chris, hi Trevor my name is sagar i have same lens but i have one question why lot of stars are appearing in my image which is taken thru rokinon 135mm, Your email address will not be published. Colour and contrast is great. If this was used to shoot video you would think that the first image was using a green screen. Available 03/21/23. The OP admits he limited experience with lenses other than what he has. (purchased for $1,100), reviewed August 12th, 2009 I thought I had to sell my 100/F2.8 macro L but thanks for letting me know I can keep it. Really like the large focusing ring. At least not in my camera (Sony A6000), the focal length in a crop sensor does not make it very suitable for portrait, the photo detail is something else, but without AF that type of photography with that focal distance and at least 80 cm of the subject it requires too much dedication, with how comfortable the DMF approach mode is for that type of photography Also in my mount it does not have any communication with the camera (it does not have a chip, it only has it for Nikon). Astrophotography is one of the ultimate tests of lens quality, as long exposure photography of deep-sky objects in space can highlight issues that are hidden during daytime photography. They are by nature designed to compromise by magnification and distance, and are therefore not optically optimized at any single setting. A Canon 70-200L IS II at 200mm at f2.8 has all the same characteristics of the Canon 135L. After a three-year hiatus, we've been at the return of the CP+ camera show in Yokohama, Japan. Standards have risen in recent years. Contrasty but not harsh. Canon EF 135mm f/2 L USM (72mm filters, 0.9m/3' close-focus, 25.0 oz./708g, about $1,035.) Valerio, Electronically Assisted Astronomy (No Post-Processing), Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, This is not recommended for shared computers, Back to DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, Buckeyestargazer 2022 in review and New Products. OTOH you can now get a 70-180 f2.8 zoom that weights virtually the same and is only a tiny bit longer (Tamron's on E mount, like 20mm longer than the AF SY or most other modern 135s), and there's lighter than ever 85/1.4s (eg Sigma's DN for L/E mount) that can achieve a very similar look while coming in at 600g, tho at an even higher price. The combination of a wide aperture and very little light lost in transmission makes very high shutter speeds possible. AF is accurate and very fast. The 200f2.8 L is excellent - I am using it right now. Focal length is great. No, Mr. 135mm F2.0 The optical design includes one extra-low dispersion lens element to control chromatic aberration, contributing to sharp, color-accurate imaging, and each of its lens elements features Ultra Multi-Coating to improve light transmission and reduce ghosting and flare. Find out what happens when Chris shoots some very expired APS film using old Canon and Nikon cameras. Begun in 1975, the Pentax K-mount legacy continues to this day. These lenses go about as close as you could get without a dedicated macro lens. This leaves you with a buttery bokeh and an object in perfect focus. thanks for the tiring patronising lecture and then agreeing with me. (purchased for $860), reviewed March 9th, 2017 A coupe of stage shows, one very recent, and a random collection using this lens exclusively To me it is a dead spot between 85 and 200. The Japanese word "bokeh" can be translated into English as "blur". It turns out that this. I thought I would miss shooting at 200mm, but 135mm is long enough for most portraits and gives a decent amount of compression. The lens is available on eBay for around $200. Its a no brainer if you use this focal length. Theres no image stabilization on the Rokinon 135mm F/2 either, but thats a non-issue for amateur astrophotographers. For posed portraiture, it's a very nice budget option.FWIW, I'm a corporate portrait and event pro. reviewed August 2nd, 2017 Large hood. I cant wait to try this lens out during the winter months on some wide-field targets in Orion. Your images have a chance at remaining sharper once critical focus has been achieved, but now you have lost the extra light-gathering power you wanted. At around $900 US very good price for quality no IS. (purchased for $700), reviewed June 13th, 2009 The lens hood is not petal-shaped, which is great news for those using this lens for astrophotography. (purchased for $800), reviewed March 15th, 2010 She's cold? Were those taken with the Canon telephotos you spoke of, and the full spectrum modified camera and the clip in filter? It's Film Friday, so let's take a look back at the film format that gave APS-C sensors their name! Thanks Gary! The sigma 150mm f2.8 tests very well, zeiss 135mm apo sonnar, and leica 180mm f3.5 apo all proven performers on star tests. The Canon 135mm f/2 is no less impressive on a full-frame camera. To prevent damage to the lens finish, apply nylon acorn nuts (or cap nuts) to the tips of the retaining ring's three alignment screws. The 135mm f2 is by all accounts one of their better and more reliable lenses however I believe the chance of a defective lens is lower with the Canon. Below, are a few examples of astrophotography images Ive taken with lenses of varying focal lengths. EF-mount only, this packs more megapixels, a bigger sensor, and a high max ISO. I will say that at F/4 this lens is extremely sharp corner to corner when used on my 60Da. Whatever lens you pick in the end, you will make a great purchase. This is the EF-M series version. Olympus 4x Optical Zoom f/2 Lens; 25-100mm (35mm Equivalent) Show More. Since Eric was so generous to share his images with me, I had to include his photo of the Rho Ophiuchi cloud complex as well. Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2 lens. enlarge. Magical images, great AF, great close focusing abilities. Although this lens feels solid, it is rather light when compared to a telescope. Will I be able to capture the heart nebula with the lens youre talking about or would I need to modify my camera as well? The cat is a case for the bit bucket i my opinion - it has no composition, a distracting background and a random parts of the body in focus - the same picture made with a smart phone could not look worse. Even if the background is very close to your subject, somehow the optical construction in the 135mm lens will still manage to separate the background beautifully. Maybe try a 400mm f/2.0 to see it that one's got enough blur. Do you expect me to gawk? Seems to me that with your gallery and website of images you should refrain from passing judgment on who is and isn't a photography master. Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC LensCheck Price (Amazon): https://amzn.to/2MOUFeOExample Images: https://astrobackyard.com/rokinon-135mm-f2-astrophotography/I've . image quality wise it is by far one the sharpest lenses ive ever used. I loved the Nikon 80-400G for a year, or so, and then found everything with it wrong, and got rid of it. But first, there are several general rules which must be understood. It is really thanks to another commentator pointing out something that finally makes sense out of this mess: This article is by someone who just got his first first telephoto ever, and is writing about how he feels when he is trying it out. As such, it applies most directly here to areas of an image that are out of focus. I actually have to walk 1/2 way up the stairs to be able get folk in the frame. Excellent build quality, fast auto focus, and its fast. The Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC. It could really use an update to its coatings. In between interviews with executives of the major companies, Dale Baskin took to the show floor to bring you this report. For those of you that like to pixel-peep, have a look at the single image frame captured using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC at F/4. USM works so quickly and accurately, it puts my 24-70/f2.8L to shame. Given the spot on DPR front page, lots of 'what-lens-should-I-buy' newbies will be spending their money on this one. Oh and it's stabilised. All lenses mentioned below are adaptable to Canon EOS cameras with slim EOS adapters which allow the lenses to focus just slightly past infinity. The Image Sensor Frame tool lets you enter in the size of your camera sensor, and focal length of your lens (or telescope) to display a frame over the star map. Are you really using 135 a lot? I need fast auto-focus, predictable focus lock and natural, vibrant color rendition. thank you for that great review and also the explanations. (purchased for $900), reviewed December 14th, 2006 Lens hood - when I bought this lens years ago the included hood was rather cheap (perhaps Canon has updated the hood) by comparison with other hoods. Tamron has announced its 11-20mm F2.8 Di III-A RXD ultra-wide angle zoom will be made available for Fujifilm X-mount. Unfortunately, standard photography lenses are generally poorly corrected for CA at the red end of the spectrum, relying on the human eye's poorer resolution in red than green or blue. No one yet mentioned a zoom lens, I had an opportunity to test my Canon 24-105L f/4 on M31 Andromeda Galaxy and received wonderful results with Canon 60D unmoded, I set it to 105mm, No vignatting, slight coma on the corners and no false color on bright stars. You can't really ask them to stand still while you move around. I really wanted to use, and like, a 135mm f2 lens so I bought the Canon version. The aesthetic quality of the blur in the out-of-focus parts of the image are buttery smooth and soft. Same thing as people mistake "shallow DOF" to blurry background. This makes me feel I shall take the Zeiss 85F1.8 off my A6000 or maybe NOT, it's just another hype article about "A" lens. A higher-res Blackmagic Studio Camera just dropped. https://www.dpreview.com/news/7777572944/video-using-the-5-700-canon-200mm-f2-on-the-new-sony-a7r-iii, DPReview TV: We share our 2021 predictions while freezing our asses off, Video: Here's how Adobe Lightroom Mobile works on the Zeiss ZX1, DPReview TV: How to set up Sony's 'Real-Time' autofocus tracking, 7Artisans releases a $195 35mm F5.6 golden pancake lens for Leica M mount cameras, OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro Sample Gallery, Fujifilm X-T5 production sample gallery (DPReview TV), DPReview TV: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM Review, DPReview TV: Sony 50mm F1.4 GM vs Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG DN Art, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. Mr Ericsson makes a very good point, and to go and dig irrelevant background info on him to discredit him is just well THAT is trolling. Barney and Chris have been shooting the new Sony 50mm F1.4 GM, and we have a bunch of full resolution samples for you to peruse. Trully sharp accross whole frame from f2 on 5d. I haven't seen compassion with the excellent Zeiss lens you quote (That BTW costs at least 3.5-4 times, yet a good comparison as similar to Zeiss, Samyang believes in providing the exceptional Image Quality, with Manual focus) but compare with Canon's L 135mm F2.0, that by many reviews, is considered as one the best Canon lenses ever made (Not . Prime means that this lens is fixed at 135mm, it is not a zoom lens that allows for focal length adjustments. Yep the speed wars in the 70's that gave us all these bokeh monsters were all about the fact that its hard to get usable images in poor lighting when your film was stuck at iso 80 (or even 400 when you were pushing it). As rest you do just by cropping or stitching. Over the years, I have tried more than two dozen telephoto lenses, until I finally found three or four perfect solutions. Sigma 105/2.8 DG EX Macro (very sharp at infinity) Pleiades (M45) Orion Nebula (M42) Carina Nebula (shown below) North American Nebula; Heart and Soul Nebula (IC 1805 / IC 1848) I rarely shoot static landscapes or posed, composed images. @juksu - you're such a liar. (Dpreview), Use the 500 Rule to find the Perfect Exposure Length for Astrophotography, Use a DSLR Ha Filter for Astrophotography, AstroBackyard | Astrophotography Tips and Tutorials2023, Optical Construction: 11 Glass elements in 7 Groups.

Lakes Funeral Home Mckee, Ky Obituaries, Best Defensive Defenseman Nhl 21, Articles C